Potential fix for code scanning alert no. 3: Workflow does not contain permissions#1135
Merged
Potential fix for code scanning alert no. 3: Workflow does not contain permissions#1135
Conversation
…n permissions Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <62310815+github-advanced-security[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
|
|
Codex usage limits have been reached for code reviews. Please check with the admins of this repo to increase the limits by adding credits. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Potential fix for https://github.com/e2b-dev/E2B/security/code-scanning/3
In general, the fix is to declare an explicit
permissionsblock that restricts theGITHUB_TOKENto the minimal scope required. For this workflow, the steps only need to read the repository contents to check out code and run tooling; they do not perform any write operations against the GitHub API, socontents: readat the workflow or job level is sufficient.The best minimal fix is to add a top-level
permissionsblock immediately after thename: Lintline in.github/workflows/lint.yml. This will apply to all jobs in the workflow (currently justlint) without altering any existing steps. The block should be:No additional imports, steps, or changes to the existing job logic are required.
Suggested fixes powered by Copilot Autofix. Review carefully before merging.
Note
Low Risk
CI-only change that narrows GitHub token permissions; no application logic or deployment behavior is affected.
Overview
Adds an explicit top-level
permissionsblock to theLintGitHub Actions workflow, restricting the defaultGITHUB_TOKENto read-only repository access (contents: read).No lint job steps or behavior are changed; the update is purely to tighten workflow token scope to satisfy code-scanning guidance.
Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit fd6bd36. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here.